Life of Pi by Yann Martel is one of those books that I can’t stop thinking about,
can’t stop talking about, can’t stop wanting to re-read. It’s billed as a story that will make you
believe in God, but really, it will make you revere the power of words and
their unbelievable strength when woven into a story. And when I heard that this novel would be
made into a movie, I was skeptical and even a bit fearful that no filmmaker’s
vision would be able to do justice to the story. I shouldn’t have worried; Ang Lee does an
amazing job. The film is very true to
the book and, if it’s even possible, adds much color and dimension. When I go to re-read it (again), I know I’ll
hear the lovely sing-song Indian accent of the actors. {Insert ‘spoiler alert’ here. If you haven’t read the book or seen the
movie and would like to remain surprised by the twist at the end, stop
here.} As much as I enjoyed the book and
the movie, I think that I enjoyed the wonderful conversation Dan and I had
about faith and truth and religion afterwards.
The story begins in India, at a family-run zoo. The boy narrator, Pi, grows up experiencing many lessons on animal behavior at the zoo. He also cultivates his spiritual self by following tenets of Hinduism, Catholicism, and Islam, much to the consternation of his intellectual family, who can’t really fathom why he would be attracted not only to one faith but three. These two aspects of his personality set the stage for the second part of the book, which begins as his family leaves India to seek a new life in Canada. Along with many of the zoo animals, the family boards a cargo ship, which sinks in a storm. Pi reaches a lifeboat and survives.
The story
proceeds with an unbelievable thread: Pi
is not alone on the lifeboat. An injured
zebra, a hyena, an orangutan and a Bengal tiger named Richard Parker are also
on board. Soon, only Pi and the tiger
remain, and through Pi’s knowledge of animals and his deep, multi-faceted
faith, they both survive, not only life at sea, but also an encounter with a
floating carnivorous island. Many months
later, their boat washes ashore on the west coast of Mexico. Richard Parker disappears into the jungle and
Pi is discovered and taken to a hospital where he recovers. Japanese officials investigating the sinking
of the ship visit him hoping to learn what caused the ship to go down. The story begins in India, at a family-run zoo. The boy narrator, Pi, grows up experiencing many lessons on animal behavior at the zoo. He also cultivates his spiritual self by following tenets of Hinduism, Catholicism, and Islam, much to the consternation of his intellectual family, who can’t really fathom why he would be attracted not only to one faith but three. These two aspects of his personality set the stage for the second part of the book, which begins as his family leaves India to seek a new life in Canada. Along with many of the zoo animals, the family boards a cargo ship, which sinks in a storm. Pi reaches a lifeboat and survives.
They do not believe his story - and neither do you, right? Because it is difficult to believe. It is difficult to believe that a teenage boy could survive more than two hundred days lost at sea. It is even more difficult to fathom that he could survive with a Bengal tiger, right? It is improbable, impossible, an absolute fiction.
And so Pi tells another story to the agents. In this story, Pi and his mother make it to the lifeboat along with two crew members from the ship. After one of the crew members kills the other, and then Pi’s mother, presumably to use their flesh for bait to fish, Pi kills the other survivor. The Japanese officials draw parallels between this story and the first, claiming that the zebra is the injured crew member, the hyena the murderous one, the orangutan is Pi’s mother, and Pi is Richard Parker. Logically, they cannot believe the first story because it is filled with too many strange happenings. When pressed by Pi, though, they say that they prefer the version with Richard Parker. And that is the version of the story which goes into their official report.
Of course, the second story is far more believable than the first. But it is a horrible story, filled with the darkest horrors of the inhumanity man is capable of; and yet there are many instances of our inhumanity to one another in the real world. Read the papers and you’ll find them on a daily basis. There are documented instances of desperate people who resort to murder and cannibalism to survive. The Donner Party and the rugby team whose plane crashed in the Andes are two well-documented instances. Rare as it is, murdering someone else to ensure one’s own survival does happen, but it is so taboo that no one wants to even consider it as a possibility even in a fictional setting.
I say this because I know in my heart that there was no tiger. Richard Parker was a figment of Pi’s imagination. It was an aspect of his dark self that he had to allow to take control, and then had to tame, in order to survive. I know this. But if you were to ask me what this book is about, I would reply, without any hesitation, that it is a story of survival, of a boy and a tiger adrift at sea together. And even though I know the truth, I choose to believe in the fanciful fairy tale that comprises the majority of the book.
And of course, isn’t that what faith is? Believing in something that is unbelievable, something that isn’t supported by facts or truth. Believing in something in spite of knowing that another story exists that is much more plausible, much more probable, much more likely. It’s human nature, I think, to want to turn away from the darkness of the truth: that man is often inherently evil. Pi is nearly saint-like, in his uncomplaining suffering due to his strange name, his unwavering faith during his many great trials. He is so good, so much better by far than any of us. And, if someone as pious as Pi obviously is, having a capacity as a child to accept more than one faith, to see that what it is that unites us is more beautifully powerful than that which divides us - if he can resort to murder, what of the rest of us? And if he could succumb to the darkest depths of inhumanity, what of the rest of us?
We just simply cannot believe that Pi could stoop to murder, even if it is to avenge his dear mother. We would rather see the truth cloaked in tiger’s hide than accept this truth, regardless of how unrecognizable it becomes. The actual story is just too awful to fathom.
When Pi and Richard Parker arrive at the carnivorous island, they are in the most desperate of straits. They are literally dying and this strange island, populated by meerkats appears to be their salvation. They are able to nurse themselves back to a reasonable state of health, but Pi begins to identify strange and disturbing incidents that eventually cause them to flee back to the lifeboat and continue their journey. The island is, essentially, a mirage of salvation and not true deliverance from their suffering. Once they realize what the island is capable of, they escape. And so what are we to make of this? The actual path you are to walk is fraught with dangers and storms; you must learn to weather these in order to survive to find your true purpose. Something that is too easy, too simple, that offers too much, is a dangerous diversion along your way. Humans have a way of seeking out the easiest way of doing something rather than the best way. The island represents shortcuts, a way of trying to get out of doing the hard work that is required. The lesson is to beware of the easy way out; something too good to be true usually is. Pi recognizes this and knows that to stay would ultimately risk everything, in spite of what little he has left to lose.
And so Pi and Richard Parker do persevere, and upon reaching Mexico, Richard Parker disappears without a backward glance, without any meaningful gesture, nothing. Pi is devastated by this, but ultimately realizes that sometimes our most defining moments in life are quiet and unceremonious; that sometimes we have to continue on alone to discover the beauty within us; that from great loneliness we can find a means to comfort ourselves.
Life of Pi proves to us that faith requires a suspension of belief (or is it a suspension of disbelief?), a willingness to believe in that which is impossible even when we consciously know it to be impossible. Pi’s survival, his taming of the beast - this is what we’d all like to believe ourselves capable of, especially in our bleakest moments. And like the Japanese officials, I choose to believe in the power of a good story over the darkness of the human condition.
No comments:
Post a Comment